Showing posts with label water. Show all posts
Showing posts with label water. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Conservation

Conservation Quiz Answer

What happened to the California couple who scaled back their watering during the states's drought?

All is revealed in the photo below:


Three things. 1. The correct answer to yesterday's quiz was 'D'. (We have a winner and a California committee is - right now - determining if there will be a prize or not.)

2. If you live in California and are under emergency orders to conserve water it is still okay to water your lawn. In fact, you'll be slapped w warnings if you don't. Similarly, in Canada, if you hear the water level in the Great Lakes is declining, one should continue to water lawns thoroughly, wash cars with lots of soap (then rinse), fill swimming pools right to the top, take lengthy showers, flush twice, and stock up on bottled water. Everything's fine. We'll just create more fresh water.

And 3, the news clip left me with questions. Are there other barriers to conservation of vital and limited resources, e.g., water, fossil fuels, peace on earth? Do such barriers constitute a Catch-22 or Catch-44?

Link to Conservation

Photo of London Free Press news clip by GH

Monday, November 5, 2012

“A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to The Economy” 1

Headlines are funny things. They come and go so quickly, like  stormy weather. Their intensity level is blaring, like a siren in the night. They can assert themselves like blockbuster movies, but are soon forgotten. 


News and headlines about The Economy often rule the day because we feel so much is at stake, i.e., jobs, our lifestyle, a second car, a night at the movies, paying down the mortgage, an education fund, putting an addition onto the house.

But in spite of a very small headline, I feel a recent piece of news deserves more play. If we fail to heed the warning, The Economy (and most things we link to it) will shrivel.

‘RECORD LOW LAKE LEVELS’


The news isn’t about changing our water-usage habits for the next two years, e.g., the need to take a 60-second shower or reduce the number of days we wash our car or water the lawn. It’s about the way we built our communities during the last 70 years and the need for a gigantic shift in the way we do business for the next 70 years.

And it’s not ‘new’ news with gigantic, captivating headlines. Here in Canada, home to thousands of lakes, rivers and streams, it may not even be on many peoples' radar.


More to follow.

Photos by GH

***

Should water levels be of great concern?

Please click here for a blurb about ‘lifestyle.’
.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

London Water Bill: “We will pay more for water” PT 3


My plan about London’s water rate increases is brilliant in so many ways. Small users catch a break because they conserve, medium users are encouraged to become small users, and large users - people and businesses that use the most water and put the biggest demands on infrastructure - pay more for the privilege.


“It will cost more to water my big lawn.”

“It will cost more to wash my car.”

“It will cost more to fill my pool.”

“It will cost more to send my kids swimming.”

“The price of golf will go up.”

“The price of beer will go up.”

True, some users will pay more for some household duties and recreational activities.

In my opinion, some increases are long overdue.

[Photos by G.Harrison]

***

What other activities will cost more? 

Please click here to read London Water Bill: “We will pay more for water” PT 2

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

London Water Bill: “We will all pay more for water” PT 2

Londoners will all one day pay more for water. But how much?

Before the official word comes down from City Hall, I propose a plan that continues to reward small users and - at the same time - encourages the medium user to reduce H2O consumption.


The plan also encourages the careless user - whether ‘medium’ or ‘large’ - to try harder to reduce, in order to save money at least.

Of course, there will be complaints.

See the ‘Complaints Department’. (Coming soon).

[Photo of brilliant plan by G.Harrison]

***

What will be the first complaint?

Please click here to read London Water Bill: “We will all pay more for water” PT 1

London Water Bill: “We will all pay more for water” PT 1

Many Londoners have much to learn about water conservation.


Please click here to read ‘Easy ways to use less water and save money’ by Mark Salerno.

However, many Londoners are already conserving, and pay the minimum fee, but are worried they’ll soon have to pay more to fund high infrastructure repair and maintenance costs.

["Me? Pay more? I'm already unplugged!!"]

They should be worried. Infrastructure costs related to water are - and will be - huge. The ‘water conservers’ should pay more. So should everyone else.

More to follow.

[Photo by G.Harrison]

***

Please click here to read more about conservation of resources

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Climate Change Concerns: PT 3 “Water, water everywhere?”

Without a doubt, I say “water, water is not everywhere” and our demands are growing from all quarters.

A growing population is an irresistible force upon a finite resource. As is agriculture, energy development and use, sanitation needs, our thirst for recreation, cooking requirements, and more.


Many topics related to water conservation will be discussed: A reduced population. Rationing. 90 second showers. Composting toilets. Meatless meals. Smaller food portions. Smaller homes, furnishings, appliances. Reduced spending on all goods. Bottled water bans. Fossil fuel reductions. Oilsands withdrawal. Swimming pool closures. Rain water for gardens. “No Golf” Days. Etcetera. (No stone will be left unturned.)

Some attempts at conservation will be made. I predict, however, almost all will be touched by crisis.

Drink up?

[Photo of Pancake Bay by GHarrison]

***

Please click here to read the following:

Climate Change Concerns: PT 1 “Water, water everywhere?”

Climate Change Concerns: PT 2 “Water, water everywhere?”

.

Friday, March 23, 2012

Climate Change Concerns: PT 2 “Water, water everywhere?”

[Farmers will need to grow 70% more food by that time (i.e., the year 2050) as rising living standards mean individuals demand more food, and meat in particular. UN study, London Free Press, Mar. 12]

We humans are a very demanding bunch of creatures, and as we demand more creature comforts we’re going to run up against shortages in all of our most important resources, one being water. It’s not everywhere anymore.

As our population rises from seven to nine billion in the next few decades, the world’s supply of water will be severely strained by increased demands from three sectors at the very least:

- the agricultural sector; it already uses 70% of the earth’s fresh-water supply and will want about 90% of drinking water to keep up with rising living standards

- the energy sector; it, including Canada’s tarsands projects, can only be described as a freshwater pig

- the sanitation sector; it demands excessive amounts of water for personal hygiene, cooking waste disposal, keeping the car shiny, etc.


["Water, water everywhere? Demands are growing."]

The UN report tells us “a silent revolution has taken place underground... as the amount of water sucked from below the surface has tripled in the past 50 years, removing a buffer against drought. And just as demand increases, supply in many regions is likely to shrink because of changed rainfall patterns, greater droughts, melting glaciers and altered river flows.”

I suppose if we want to watch a perfect storm, we need to look no farther than our rapidly dwindling freshwater supply.

Without question, we must think now about stringent conservation techniques - related to food and energy production, water use and sanitation - that will guide us toward a sustainable future. Just as some turn piggy banks upside down, then shake them, in order to retrieve the very last coin, we must turn our way of life (and our way of doing business) upside down, and vigorously shake, in order to see what human behaviours, including creature comfort habits, are most steering us toward the demise of the human creature.

No stone can be left unturned.

More to follow.

[Photo of north shore, Lake Superior by GHarrison]

***

Please click here to read Climate Change Concerns: PT 1 “Water, water everywhere?”

.

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Climate Change Concerns: “Water, water everywhere?”


[Farmers will need to grow 70% more food by that time (i.e., 2050)... . Mar. 12, London Free Press]

In 2050, farmers (local, national, international) will be working their butts off trying to feed 9,000,000,000 people. Chances are, they’ll face dozens of challenges.

Ugly consequences related global warming, climate change, lack of clean fuel sources, etc., will surely be felt by all farmers, and if a recent United Nations study is even half-accurate, they’ll have a heckuva time finding a decent glass of water to cool off with at the end of a long day in the fields.

So too will you and I. (Though I’ll have to reach the age of 101, don’t count me out. Great-grandmother Gordon reached her 104th or 105th birthday when I was a child, and I may be as resilient as she was).

Here are a few numbers from the UN study:

Demand from agriculture, which already uses 70% of the earth’s fresh-water supply, is likely to rise by about 20% by 2050

Demand will be driven by a growing population, predicted to increase by two billion people (and reach nine billion) by 2050

Demand will also be driven by rising living standards, i.e., farmers will need to grow 70% more food by that time because individuals are demanding “more food, and meat in particular”

Demand, demand, demand... sounds like the first three acts of a very scary stage play. And it gets scarier when we realize the 70% predicted increase in food will be demanded by a 29% increase in population.

So, when a study says now that “the world’s water supply is being strained by climate change and the growing food, energy and sanitary needs of a fast-growing population”, we should be thinking now about stringent conservation techniques - related to food and energy production, water use and sanitation - that will guide us toward a sustainable future.

And what should ‘stringent conservation techniques’ include?

Stay tuned.

[Photo by GHarrison]

***

Please click here for more Climate Change Concerns.

.

Friday, September 2, 2011

Zoom w a View: One man, one camera, one leaf

I have two sisters in Ontario who will eventually retire to Prince Edward Island. Part of the lure of the island - I’m certain - is the water surrounding it.

I think I’ll retire to a place closer at hand - my son’s dock in Fenelon Falls. Whenever I visit I spend a lot of time beside and in a channel between two lovely lakes (one in view just past a neighbour’s own dock and boat house).

Photo 1 “The star of the show heads west”


Photo 2 “The star turns to the east”


Photo 3 “Another leaf? I’m not telling”


Photo 4 “I’ll retire full-time in 20 years”



[Photos by G. Harrison, Aug. 2011]

What is it about the water that brings us to its edge over and over again?

PS - Son, have my room ready by 2031.

***

Please click here for more Zoom w a View.

.

Sunday, August 28, 2011

Zoom w a View: Over my head in the water

While sittin' on a dock on a river and sittin' atop my favourite perch I had my camera handy.

The water, though colder than during July's visit, still finds a way to relax my weary bones.








[Photos by G.Harrison]

***

Please click here to view more Zoom w a View near the water.

.

Saturday, August 27, 2011

Fenelon Falls PT 2: "I must be getting old... or something"

I must have needed a break. I've had two naps in two days.

Usually, I take about two naps per year, but after driving to Fenelon Falls yesterday I feel asleep during a lull in a conversation. And this morning I grabbed 40 winks after a hearty breakfast.

Maybe I fell asleep so easily this morning because I didn't have my usual two or three cups of coffee with breakfast. Yesterday's nap I blame on the long drive and fresh air blowing through the car. Or maybe it's something else.

I overheard my wife explaining my sleepyhead ways to my son and his wife in the following ways:

"Well, your dad has been working nonstop in the workshop for the last several weeks."


(Well, there is that.)

"He had a birdhouse sale recently. He's been getting back into jogging too. He was out for two hours on Tuesday night."

(Sure, I've been busy... but napping? What's with that?)

"He's not as young as he used to be... but he doesn't know that, I guess."


["Wake up. People will start to talk.": photos by GH]

(Hey, I know I have another birthday coming. But I bet it's something else.)

Maybe it's because I've been swimming in the channel, and the water is colder than last time up here. I mean, even the ducks are tired.

It's gotta be the cold water.

***

Please click here to read Fenelon Falls PT 1.

.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Zoom w a View: PT3 - Sittin’ on the dock on the river

Time - I’m not sure if I can find out. Time will tell.

Place - The very edge of a dock, Fenelon Falls.

Assignment - Put one toe in the water.

Photo 1 - "Some river, with toes nearby"


Photo 2 - “More river, no toes”


[Photos by G.Harrison]

***

Please click here to view Zoom w a View PT2.

.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Zoom w a View: PT2 - Sittin’ on the dock on the river

Time - I still don’t know. Do I even own a watch?

Place - Still on my older son’s dock, Fenelon Falls

Assignment - Sit, relax, point, shoot

Photo 1 - "Some river, some rock, some dock"


Photo 2 - “More river, more rock, more dock”


['Sittin' in the mornin' sun...": photos by GH]

***

Please click here for more Zoom w a View by the river.

.

Saturday, August 20, 2011

Zoom w a View: Sittin’ on the dock on the river

Time - I don’t know. I’m not wearing a watch

Place - My older son’s dock, Fenelon Falls

Assignment - Sit, relax, point, shoot

Photo 1 - "The dock and the river"


Photo 2 - "Just the river"


[Photos by G. Harrison]

***

Please click here for more Zoom w a View.

.

Series of Significance: Food bubbles, water bubbles in the air

The following three posts were initially published separately beginning on August 15. They are repeated here inside one bubble for your convenience. No extra charge. gah

It’s “Another Saturday Night” PT 1 and I ain’t got no money

Sing it with me now:

“Another Saturday night and I ain't got nobody

I got some money 'cause I just got paid
How I wish I had someone to talk to

I'm in awful way.”


Sam Cooke sang it right in 1963 but if he was singing his hit song today he’d likely have to change the second line to ‘I got no money though I just got paid.’

Oh, he’d be in an awful way all right.

Why? Because he’d be in debt just like most other people in Canada and the US.

Though there are more troubled waters looming, let's look at the debt issue for one more minute.

A recent article with a Canadian perspective states the following:

The financial situation in the US is bad; Washington is borrowing just to stay afloat. Sadly, the same can be said for many Canadian families. (Aug. 4, London Free Press)


[“Hug your piggy bank. Hang on tight.”]

Though the American family wasn’t mentioned, the outlook is as bleak for our neighbours to the south.

Though we think we live in the land of plenty, it isn’t a prosperous place for all families, says the article.

“Credit card and mortgage debt, combined with everyday expenses like putting food on the table, are keeping Canadians from saving for the future.”

Today is tough for many. Tomorrow will likely be tougher without savings.

Though the US is taking on “six times in debt what it makes in annual revenue” - way too much - the average Canadian, with $1.47 debt for every $1 earned, is in a very vulnerable position too.

“Once interest rates begin to climb from historic lows later this year, it could be too late for many Canadians to dig out,” says the head of online bank ING Direct Canada.

Though some recent news reports “more that half of Canadians say they are making good progress paying down their debt” (Aug. 9, London Free Press), the progress may not be enough to help them stay afloat when other troubled waters on the horizon swamp the fragile boat they have boarded by taking on a lifestyle bigger than their weekly pay cheque can afford.

[My mantra, i.e., reduce spending, pay down debt, save money for the tough times ahead, is getting timelier by the minute.]

More about troubled waters to follow.

.

It’s “Another Saturday Night” PT 2 and I still ain’t got no money

[“Though some recent news reports ‘more that half of Canadians say they are making good progress paying down their debt’ (Aug. 9, London Free Press), the progress may not be enough to help them stay afloat.” Aug. 15, G. Harrison]

Sing it with me:

When you're weary, feeling small

When tears are in your eyes, 
I will dry them all.

I'm on your side

When times get rough
And friends just can't be found,

Like a bridge over troubled water 
I will lay me down
Like a bridge over troubled water 
I will lay me down.
(P. Simon, 1969)

I think Paul Simon’s song will come to mind often in the near future when troubled waters on the horizon swamp the fragile boat many have boarded by taking on a lifestyle bigger than their weekly pay cheque can afford.

Journalist and author Gwynne Dyer addresses actual water woes - linked to financial problems I touched on in PT 1 - that are building up behind a weakening dam in his most recent column ‘Food supply depends on water supply’ and we should all take note.

[Please click here to link to Dyer’s article.]

Financial problems will likely sink many families soon, but water and subsequent food troubles will sink whole countries.

Dyer mentions more than water and food bubbles that will one day burst. He says, “There is the Chinese real-estate bubble, the biggest in history, which may take the whole world economy down with it when it bursts.” But then he adds, ominously, “But nothing compares with the food bubble.”

Okay, my interest was piqued.

Some highlights follow:

the average world price of grain soared by 71% in the last year

it’s a catastrophe for poor countries, not a catastrophe for some in rich countries who spend 10% or less of income on food supplies

climate change and water constraints will eventually make the situation more serious

water and food bubbles envelop and will affect everyone and their wallets and purses negatively

Some readers may be old enough to recall a food price crisis in the early 1970s and that “the problem was quickly solved by the famous Green Revolution, which hugely increased yields of rice, wheat and corn.”

And today some might be lulled into thinking that for every problem there will be a technological solution, so why worry.

There are drawbacks to that kind of thinking.

About the earlier food price crisis Dyer says, “The only drawback was that the Green Revolution wasn’t really all that green. Higher-yielding strains of familiar crops played a part in the solution, certainly, but so did a vastly increased use of fertilizer: global fertilizer use tripled between 1960 and 1975.”

Dyer perhaps assumes we know that depending on vast amounts of fertilizer is very short-sighted so goes on to his main point - future water shortages and food crises. But many don’t think about fertilizer, especially when roast beef is on sale at $2.99 per pound.

Here are a few highlights about fertilizer from ‘The Omnivore’s Dilemma by Michael Pollan:

“When humankind acquired the power to fix nitrogen (and thereby produce fertilizer), the basis of soil fertility shifted from a total reliance on the energy of the sun to a new reliance on fossil fuel.” (pg. 44)


[“I highly recommend this book”: photo GH]

“...synthetic fertilizer opens the way to monoculture, allowing the farmer to bring the factory’s economies of scale and efficiency to nature... fixing nitrogen allowed the food chain to turn from the logic of biology and embrace the logic of industry. Instead of eating exclusively from the sun, humanity now began to sip petroleum.” (pg. 45)

“When you add together the natural gas in the fertilizer to the fossil fuels it takes to make the pesticides, drive the tractors, and harvest, dry, and transport the corn (more than half of all synthetic nitrogen made today is applied to corn), you find that every bushel of industrial corn requires the equivalent of between a quarter and a third of a gallon of oil to grow it - or around fifty gallons of oil per acre of corn. (Some estimates are higher.)”

“Put another way, it takes more than a calorie of fossil fuel energy to produce a calorie of food... ecologically this is a fabulously expensive way to produce food (especially for beef @ $2.99 per pound) - but ‘ecologically’ is no longer the operative standard. As long as fossil fuel energy is so cheap and available, it makes good economic sense to produce corn (and many other foods) this way.”

Fertilizer. Fossil fuels. Food. The interconnection in modern times is guaranteed. The cheap price of food is not. As long as we rely on factory scale farms where production is driven by oil, the price of oil will determine the price of food.

Today, with the price per barrel at $86.05 (a real deal when compared to the price of $105 just a few months ago), and nations around the world scrambling to find new sources in more hard to reach places, the price of food will likely only go up.

Then there’s Dyer’s water issues.

More to follow.

.

It’s “Another Saturday Night” PT 3 and, that’s right, I ain’t got no money

[“Fertilizer. Fossil fuels. Food. The interconnection in modern times is guaranteed. The cheap price of food is not. As long as we rely on factory scale farms where production is driven by oil, the price of oil will determine the price of food... the price of food will likely only go up. Then there’s Dyer’s water issues.” G. Harrison, Aug. 16]

According to Gwynne Dyer, the Chinese real-estate bubble, “the biggest in history,” could take down the whole world economy when it bursts.

As well, as oil prices go so go food prices, since modern factory food production is highly dependent upon fossil fuel based fertilizers and food transportation is based upon even more fossil fuel.

And before I can holler ‘enough already’, there’s the pending problems related to fossil water (Dyer’s term) to consider and act upon.

Not only has the use of fertilizer grown (“global fertilizer use tripled between 1960 and 1975”) but “there was an enormous expansion of the world’s irrigated area. It has more than tripled since 1950.”

Some highlights from Dyer’s article follow:

- 10% of the world’s cropland is irrigated but that 10% provides about 40% of the world’s food

- most new irrigated land uses water from deep underground aquifers (or “fossil” water) which will eventually be pumped dry

- the world will eventually have to make do with the one-third of the land watered by the weather

- it won’t be enough


Though the world’s aquifers won’t all run dry at the same time, Dyer states most aquifers will be dry in 30 years, and some in the US are passed their peak already (e.g., Texas in 1978, California in 1997).

China and India, the two most-heavily populated regions in the world, are straining water resources as well at this time (grain for 175 million Indians is produced by over-pumping water; 130 million Chinese face a dwindling supply now for grain), Israel imports 98% of its grain now and Saudi Arabia will import 100% of its grain by next year.


[“Chinese fishermen on an almost dried up irrigation canal”: photo by David Gray, Reuters]

Rich countries and families will be able to pay when grain prices double from the current price (already we know that the average world price for grain soared by 71% in the last year), but not every country or family one is rich.

Already mounting debt throughout the world is a daily news story and the pile of solutions is getting slimmer by the minute. Is there a ‘bridge over troubled water’ for those who do not have the means to keep up with multiple rising costs? (Unfortunately, food is but one part of our budget).

Dyer concludes by saying, “Never mind what climate change will eventually do to the world food supply (although we will mind very much when it finally hits). The crisis is coming sooner than that, and it is quite unavoidable. We are living way beyond our means.”

Many will be tempted to say it’s just “Another Saturday night and I ain't got nobody” and that’s the extent of their problems.

If we collectively put off living under our means much longer, however, we may miss the satisfying opportunity to do even that. 

***

Please click here to read more about our lovely debt situation.

.


Wednesday, August 17, 2011

PT 3 It’s “Another Saturday Night” and I ain’t got no money

[“Fertilizer. Fossil fuels. Food. The interconnection in modern times is guaranteed. The cheap price of food is not. As long as we rely on factory scale farms where production is driven by oil, the price of oil will determine the price of food... the price of food will likely only go up. Then there’s Dyer’s water issues.” G. Harrison, Aug. 16]

According to Gwynne Dyer, the Chinese real-estate bubble, “the biggest in history,” could take down the whole world economy when it bursts.

As well, as oil prices go so go food prices, since modern factory food production is highly dependent upon fossil fuel based fertilizers and food transportation is based upon even more fossil fuel.

And before I can holler ‘enough already’, there’s the pending problems related to fossil water (Dyer’s term) to consider and act upon.

Not only has the use of fertilizer grown (“global fertilizer use tripled between 1960 and 1975”) but “there was an enormous expansion of the world’s irrigated area. It has more than tripled since 1950.”

[Please click here for link to Dyer’s article in The London Free Press, Aug. 13.]

Some highlights from Dyer’s article follow:

- 10% of the world’s cropland is irrigated but that 10% provides about 40% of the world’s food

- most new irrigated land uses water from deep underground aquifers (or “fossil” water) which will eventually be pumped dry

- the world will eventually have to make do with the one-third of the land watered by the weather

- it won’t be enough


Though the world’s aquifers won’t all run dry at the same time, Dyer states most aquifers will be dry in 30 years, and some in the US are passed their peak already (e.g., Texas in 1978, California in 1997).

China and India, the two most-heavily populated regions in the world, are straining water resources as well at this time (grain for 175 million Indians is produced by over-pumping water; 130 million Chinese face a dwindling supply now for grain), Israel imports 98% of its grain now and Saudi Arabia will import 100% of its grain by next year.

Rich countries and families will be able to pay when grain prices double from the current price (already we know that the average world price for grain soared by 71% in the last year), but not every country or family one is rich.

Already mounting debt throughout the world is a daily news story and the pile of solutions is getting slimmer by the minute. Is there a ‘bridge over troubled water’ for those who do not have the means to keep up with multiple rising costs? (Unfortunately, food is but one part of our budget).

Dyer concludes by saying, “Never mind what climate change will eventually do to the world food supply (although we will mind very much when it finally hits). The crisis is coming sooner than that, and it is quite unavoidable. We are living way beyond our means.”


["Can we live under our means and still sing and dance?": photo GH]

Many will be tempted to say it’s just “Another Saturday night and I ain't got nobody” and that’s the extent of their problems.

If we collectively put off living under our means much longer, however, we may miss the satisfying opportunity to do even that. 

***

Please click here to read PT 2 It’s “Another Saturday Night” and I ain’t got no money.

.

Monday, August 16, 2010

Zoom w a View: A breeze blew through my hair

Or, it blew through what’s left of it.

After doing a bit of birdhouse spotting I parked my motorcycle in the shade of a tree near the shores of Lake Erie in Pt. Bruce and put on my always-flattering swimsuit.

(Though it draws some attention to my short pale legs it does make me look taller. That’s what I say to myself at any rate).


I spread out a towel, sat down and reveled in the breeze and sound of the waves.


I took a few pictures then said to myself, go jump in the lake.


["How could you not jump into the water?": photos GH]

I did, and 15 minutes later I was totally refreshed.

***

Another lake, another time.

.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Get your feet wet

Four photos from Fenelon Falls, taken last week while relaxing on a dock and getting more sun than I really needed.








[“Grampa is finished taking pictures, Ollie. Now you can go swimming.”: photos GH]

***

Ollie loved the water. Olympic swimmer? Maybe.

Did you got your feet wet recently? Where?

.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

If water is at risk what happens to our favourite cold drinks?

They’d likely get more expensive. Filtration systems don’t come cheap.

Though the Grand River system (the closest to London of Canada’s rivers that made a recent World Wildlife Fund report initially mentioned here) is reportedly ‘well managed’ (though ‘increased demand for water from growing cities is a threat’) the same may not be said for the once clean and mighty Thames River, now a bare shadow of its former self.

If conservation of natural resources ever becomes important to the majority of people we may see some improvements in all natural waterways near high population or agricultural areas. But only if we change our treatment of those resources.

In the case of our waterways, how could we reduce our demand on them?


["Fresh water at Tobermory": GAH]

Stop washing our car with a hose, or as frequently

Take 2 minute showers

Eat less meat (meat industry is water intensive from start to finish)

Give up bottled water (plastic industry is water intensive)

Wash dishes by hand

Reduce coffee intake (coffee industry is water intensive)


The Great Lakes will thank you.

***

I need one more water conservation idea. I want seven in all.

.

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Guess where the early Spaniards threw their dead horses?

I guess we shouldn’t be surprised that Canadian rivers are in trouble.

Of the 10 largest river systems in Canada only 2 are in near natural states. Six are in fair or poor condition. Five are in declining states.

North Americans have a long history of trying to control natural surroundings for their own good to the detriment of the environment and their own well-being.

From Land of the Eagles - a natural history of North America: A Narragansett chief named Miantonomo summarized the impact of early New England colonists on the land from a native point of view when he spoke to a tribal gathering in 1642:

“You know our fathers had plenty of deer and skins. Our plains were full of deer, as also our woods, and of turkies, and our coves full of fish and fowl.

“But these English having gotten our land, they with scythes cut down the grass, and with axes fell the tree; their cows and horses eat the grass, and their hogs spoil our clam banks, and we shall all be starved.”


The English had kind of a ‘let’s just do what we want’ kind of attitude. It still persists to this day.

Earlier still, when Spaniards tried every conceivable effort to gain control of what is now Mexico, they brought certain peculiar habits along with them.


When horses died they dumped them in the rivers, believing perhaps they had carefully washed their hands of the matter.

We may not be doing any better today.

The worst of the ten river systems is the S. Saskatchewan, and a recent report said about it the following:

"Canada’s most threatened river with 70% of its water drained for farming use."

70% more conservation of natural resources may be needed soon - from all of us.

.