Sunday, March 28, 2010

The Four EEEEs Pt 1: Oh, what a tangled web we weave

Surely you read this. Surely your jaw dropped.

Surely you at least put down your bottle of prescription medicine for a moment to read the fine details.

A recent headline shouted, Canadian seniors take 5 prescription drugs on average.


Wha...!?

I immediately thought, if this isn’t a story that entangles issues related to the Four EEEEs (Economy, Environment, Education and Entertainment) I don’t know what is.

I read the following:

The Canadian Institute of Health Information study says 67% of people over 65 take five or more types of drugs, 21% take 10 or more and 6% take 15 or more.

Public spending on prescription drugs in 2009 totalled $11.4 billion, a significant chunk of which was spent on seniors, the report says
. (Mar. 20, The London Free Press)

Though I’m not 65, so the report obviously didn’t apply to me, I quickly spit out the hotdog smeared in four condiments I happened to be eating. (Usually I add five but we were out of cheddar cheese cubes).

Let’s look at this another way.

Say you walk into a fast-food restaurant and notice a group of 65-year olds tucking into cheeseburgers and fries.

2 out of 3 have 5 or more pill bottles hidden away.

1 in 5 have 10 or more bottles of pills.

And 1 in 16 has a sore shoulder from carrying 15 or more bottles of pills.

Only 1 in 3 of the seniors has four or fewer prescriptions.

I must ask: How many seniors are not taking any prescription drugs? There must obviously be very few.

Why are so many seniors taking medications?

The article says the following:

Statins, which are used to treat high cholesterol, are the most commonly prescribed drug, with 40% of seniors taking them.

Next on the list are ACE inhibitors, which 32% of seniors use to treat heart failure and high blood pressure.


The above raises more questions, doesn’t it?

***

Please click here to read Part 2.

How many prescription medications are you taking?

Are there preventative measures that are just as helpful, if not more so, than prescriptive measures?

.

No comments: